Bem-vindos a Taberna!
Grupo do Facebook


The four levels of MGTOW - betas shrug.

Ver o tópico anterior Ver o tópico seguinte Ir em baixo

The four levels of MGTOW - betas shrug.

Mensagem por White Witch em 24/9/2015, 11:20

Common reasons for this:
a) Lack of desire to produce due to being denied a meaningful and socially accepted path to respect within the grasp of the everyday beta man.
b) Refusal to pay into confiscatory wealth transfers from productive beta men to other groups via the state. The amount paid into taxation vs the amount of benefits received from the state is one example of this.

Resources withdrawn from society:
a) Economic production falls drastically as beta men refuse to be more than self-sufficient.
b) Taxation revenue falls drastically as beta men stop producing, resulting in greater debt and borrowing required to maintain government spending.

In Esther Vilar's work The Manipulated Man, she posits the following theory as to why traditionalism, interestingly, does not solely restrict the sexual natures of women as feminists claim, but also the sexual natures of men. Her theory, from what I remember from reading the book, goes like this:

*Men have three states: they are capable of great destruction, great creation, or great hedonism.
*For obvious reasons, we do not want destruction, but men will snap under pressure or participate in it for a cause.
*Most men, however, will default to hedonism, since it requires the least effort. This results in what detractors call "Peter Pan syndrome".
*In order to get men to produce, there are three methods that have been tried throughout history: forced production (I.E. slavery), restricting access to resources, and giving them a family.
*Slavery requires enforcement by other men, which in turn shifts the problem: how do the elite alphas convince the enforcers to comply? One way of doing this was to entice the enforcers with women who were attractive but not so enough for the alphas, but that does not solve the problem of slavery meaning that men will take every opportunity to underperform.
*Restriction of access to resources does not work very well because most men do not require large amounts of resources to be content. Food, shelter, and a source of entertainment is usually enough to satiate most men, leading to the stereotypical bachelor pad. Consumption in the modern world today is driven overwhelmingly by women (80-91%, depending on which economist you ask), so men producing enough to support themselves is insufficient to meet the needs of civilisation.
*Hence, there is a need to give a man a family to incentivise him to create. Enter traditional monogamous marriage, in which a man must give up his instinctive polygamous desires to settle for more reliably-provided sex with his wife.
*However, men do not have the certainty of paternity that women do of maternity. In lean times (most of human history), both men and women will tend to look after their own first, but as stated, men do not have that certainty.
*Hence, womens' hypergamous natures must be curtailed in order to allow men the assurance of paternity of their children. The sexual natures of women are curtailed only as a secondary measure to the primary motive of curtailing male sexual nature.
*With a family that he knows is undoubtedly his to work for, men produce to their maximum capacity and build civilisation.

Knowing this, remove a man's family from him, and he no longer has any incentive to produce. This is why chilamony is so important to the state - enforced by the long arm of the law, he is required to continue producing even though the joys of his family are no longer open to him. And today, Pimp Daddy Government has replaced the husband as the ultimate alpha that no single man can compete with, confiscating resources from men and using them to buy votes from women - a simple breakdown of which demographic puts in/receives more from welfare programs, taxes and government handouts, other things being equal, will quickly show this. Even the mainstream media has finally begun to pick up on this: "men dropping out of the workforce - going hunting, fishing."

http://theobserverwatches.blogspot.com.br/2012/12/the-four-levels-of-mgtow-betas-shrug.html

_________________________________________
TUTORIAL=> Encurtando e criptografando links
avatar
White Witch
Webmaster
Webmaster

Mensagens : 1777
Data de inscrição : 02/07/2014
Localização : Seversk - Rússia

http://eusouarcaico.forumeiros.com/

Voltar ao Topo Ir em baixo

Re: The four levels of MGTOW - betas shrug.

Mensagem por Joe em 24/9/2015, 19:51

Bom texto.

Mas não entendi o que é "chilamony". Não achei o significado nem no dicionário Oxford.

_________________________________________
""Ain't nothing sadder than an outdoor cat thinks he's an indoor cat."
avatar
Joe
SATANISTA

Mensagens : 3507
Data de inscrição : 01/07/2014

Voltar ao Topo Ir em baixo

Re: The four levels of MGTOW - betas shrug.

Mensagem por Marcoasf em 24/9/2015, 19:54

Joe escreveu:Bom texto.

Mas não entendi o que é "chilamony". Não achei o significado nem no dicionário Oxford.

Deve ser um trocadilho com child e alimony. Talvez equiparando a pensão a mulheres como quem está financiando uma criança incapaz de se virar sozinha.
avatar
Marcoasf
Aspirante a Arcaico
Aspirante a Arcaico

Mensagens : 654
Data de inscrição : 03/07/2014

Voltar ao Topo Ir em baixo

Re: The four levels of MGTOW - betas shrug.

Mensagem por Conteúdo patrocinado


Conteúdo patrocinado


Voltar ao Topo Ir em baixo

Ver o tópico anterior Ver o tópico seguinte Voltar ao Topo

- Tópicos similares

 
Permissão deste fórum:
Você não pode responder aos tópicos neste fórum